Keen original research, July 2026

The State of Media Measurement

We asked 120 senior brand and agency leaders how they plan, measure, and defend media investment. The biggest barrier isn't the market, the model, or the money — it's alignment with finance.

The headline finding

49.2%

of advertisers have only surface-level alignment with their finance team on tying marketing metrics to business KPIs.

Surface-level: 49.2% Perfect alignment: 28.3% Total misalignment: 15.0% Frequent friction: 7.5%

40.8%

override tool recommendations because they conflict with leadership expectations

30%

now use MMM as their primary budget-allocation methodology — the #1 answer

51.7%

track both funnel ends but struggle to connect awareness to conversions

48.3%

already use AI for real-time programmatic budget reallocation

The problem

Marketing and finance are speaking different languages

Only 28.3% of advertisers say finance evaluates marketing on profit, pipeline, or customer lifetime value. For everyone else, the relationship ranges from conditional acceptance — finance takes the ROAS number but demands strict proof — to treating marketing as a pure expense line.

The cost shows up in the plans themselves: when planning tools recommend a strategy, the single most common reason marketers don't follow it is that it conflicts with leadership expectations — ahead of any concern about the data or the tools.

Why marketers override their own tools Most common reason for deviating from tool recommendations (n=120)

Conflicts with leadership expectations

40.8%

Tools miss external market shifts

25.8%

Data inputs feel outdated or irrelevant

25.8%

Updates arrive too slowly to react

7.5%

A quarter of all mid-campaign plan changes (25.8%) are triggered by leadership budget directives — not by evidence.

When the model and the boardroom disagree, the boardroom wins — 4 in 10 media plans are re-drawn to match leadership expectations, not the evidence.

The metrics leadership sees are the ones marketers trust least

Given one metric to prove marketing success to the board, 62.5% would choose a revenue number. The metrics that dominate board decks today — CTR and ROAS — top the overrated list.

Most overrated by leadership n=120, bars scaled to chart maximum

Click-through rate (CTR)

25.0%

Return on ad spend (ROAS)

23.3%

Brand lift / sentiment

22.5%

CPM

15.0%

Last-touch attribution

8.3%

Reach / impressions

5.8%

The one metric they'd report to the board n=120, bars scaled to chart maximum

Total revenue

36.7%

Incremental revenue / sales lift

25.8%

Customer lifetime value

20.0%

Cost per acquisition

14.2%

Share of voice / brand equity

3.3%

62.5% choose revenue — the language finance already speaks.

The evidence: measurement

Confident on paper, blind in flight

53.3%

are very confident their measurement framework captures the true ROI of the media mix…

40.8%

…but only this many are very confident they could explain why each channel gets the budget it gets.

The biggest blind spot in measurement n=120

No real-time insight for in-flight optimization

40.0%

Proving long-term brand equity vs short-term sales

27.5%

Measuring cross-channel interactions

27.5%

Cookie deprecation & privacy data loss

5.0%

68.3% need updated insights weekly or faster to optimize their mix — the cadence their current setup can't deliver.

The hardest cross-channel dynamics to measure n=120

CTV × paid search × digital audio

31.7%

Paid social × search / direct traffic

30.0%

Retail media networks × paid search

23.3%

Creator / influencer × paid social

12.5%

No mechanism to evaluate interactions

2.5%

And the funnel splits the middle: 51.7% track both brand and performance but can't connect them.

The evidence: workflow

Modern methods, manual burden

MMM is now the most-used allocation methodology — brands lead at 35.0%. But cost keeps advanced measurement out of reach for many, and half of all teams say the modeling itself is their biggest time sink.

Primary allocation methodology n=120, scaled to maximum

Marketing mix modeling

30.0%

Multi-touch attribution

27.5%

Last-touch / last-click

20.0%

Incrementality experiments

15.0%

Intuition & historical spend

7.5%

Barrier to advanced measurement n=120, scaled to maximum

High cost & resource constraints

40.8%

Lack of clean, centralized data

30.8%

Slow turnaround times

20.0%

Leadership resistance

8.3%

Leadership resistance is the smallest barrier — the appetite is there; the economics aren't.

Most time-consuming step n=120, scaled to maximum

Analysis & modeling

50.0%

Data aggregation & cleaning

28.3%

Stakeholder alignment

14.2%

Execution & adjustment

7.5%

The #1 analytics tradeoff: software vs services (35.8%) — automate or keep hiring.

The evidence: AI

AI is already in the workflow — trust is the frontier

Nine in ten teams already apply AI somewhere in measurement. The leading uses attack the speed problem head-on: real-time budget reallocation (48.3%) and predictive modeling of media-mix scenarios (45.8%). What holds teams back isn't capability — it's trust: data privacy first, black-box models second.

90.8%

use AI somewhere in measurement & analytics

41.7%

name data privacy as their #1 AI concern

How teams use AI today Multi-select (n=120)

Real-time programmatic budget reallocation

48.3%

Predictive modeling & scenario simulation

45.8%

Automating data cleaning & ingestion

40.0%

Not using AI for measurement yet

9.2%

Top concerns: data privacy (41.7%), black-box algorithms (24.2%), over-optimization (21.7%), integration friction (12.5%).

Explore the data

Brand vs agency: same survey, different worlds

Pick a question and flip between the full sample, brand marketers, and agency leaders. The splits tell their own story — brands lead on MMM and worry about build-vs-buy; agencies bend to leadership more and fear the black box.

Alignment with finance KPIs

How would you characterize the alignment between marketing metrics and finance's business KPIs? (All respondents, n=120)

Surface-level — finance accepts metrics but demands proof

49.2%

Perfect alignment — evaluated on profit, pipeline, or CLV

28.3%

Total misalignment — marketing is an expense line

15.0%

Frequent friction — constant attribution debates

7.5%

Agencies report total misalignment more often than brands — 18.3% vs 11.7%. True alignment is a minority position on both sides.

“Marketers have a preferred set of tools they use for media planning and measurement, but their biggest barrier to success lies within their own organization. To create more harmony between marketing and finance, organizations need to align on metrics that prove the full value of that investment while also investing in tools that can better optimize for outcomes.”
Bradley Keefer, Chief Revenue Officer at Keen Decision Systems Bradley Keefer Chief Revenue Officer, Keen Decision Systems

Keen marketing mix modeling platform

Ready to speak finance's language?

Keen ties media plans to revenue and profit — with always-on modeling, scenario planning your CFO can interrogate, and forecasts that hold up in the boardroom. All in real time.

Keen Decision Systems is a next-generation marketing mix SaaS platform that ties investment decisions to real business outcomes. On average, Keen customers see a 25% improvement in brand performance within the first year.

Methodology

Keen Decision Systems surveyed 120 senior brand and agency marketing leaders in June 2026. The sample splits evenly: 60 brand-side, 60 agency-side. Respondents span retail, tech, finance, CPG, travel, and entertainment, with 2026 budgets from under $5M (43.3%) to over $50M (5.8%). Percentages are of the full sample unless noted and may not sum to 100 due to rounding.